ACORN Shredding Documents
06/02/10 17:44 Filed in: Politics and Corruption | Obama Lies | Media Propagandists | Double Standard Democraps
Once again, the dirty ACORN is caught with its hand in the cookie jar...and crumbs on its corrupt face. Remember these guys illegally "created" nearly 23,000 voters in Nevada prior to the 2008 elections.
Here is the original article:
ACORN Scandal: Dumping Incriminating Documents
Here is the lively social blog discussion that ensued:
Liberal Friend’s Response: So a Breitbart Empire blog entry (probably found on Drudge in 72 pt. font size) is what passes for "news" these days? Socialists! Communists! ACORNS! Birth Certificates! Death Panels! Yawn. We've got soldiers dying in Afghanistan - get a grip.
My Response: Wow...must have struck a liberal nerve there.
I mean, considering that 12 ex-CNN staffers immediately abandoned CNN after the election to join Obamunist's staff, that pretty much brings the count to: NBC, CBS, and CNN in the tank for the libbies. Now we all HAVE to go to Breitbart, Mediawatch, Drudgereport, and just about anywhere else to get anything other than liberal propaganda. Its a sad state of affairs my friend BRING BACK JIMMY CARTER! We miss him.
Technically, Breitbart reported biggovernment.com's investigation obviously, because we would never hear anything about ACORN scandals on the above mentioned "news" outlets.
(I always put news in quotation marks because coming from ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, MSNBC
- it more resembles propaganda than it does actual journalistic reporting - which we call “news”.)
Conservative Friend #1: With Acorn suing the Goverment to get its (paid for by taxpayers) funding back, this needs to be said and it needs to be news.
Liberal Friend: Lot's of things need to be said and need to be news.
Here's one:
"4 US Service Members Die in Afghan Attacks
By HEIDI VOGT (AP)
KABUL — Bomb attacks and a firefight killed four U.S. troops in 24 hours in Afghanistan, the military said Monday, adding to the growing toll as NATO and the U.S. consider whether to send more forces to the war."
Keep collecting your ACORNS (and ex-CNN staffers), I'll watch the body count...
Conservative Friend: Personally, I grew up Military. I know the costs and the count. But, you are correct. Their sacrifice needs to be on the news and honored.
Now if our new administration will get off its duff and make a decision about Afganistan...
Conservative Friend #2: It's kinda funny how liberal's will defend this "news" because it casts an unkind shadow upon them..then try to make a smoke screen about another non related issue...it would sure play out differently if it was a conservative group that did the deeds that ACORN did...!
Liberal Friend: The funny liberal never once defended ACORN. I could care less about them or their waste management practices. I fail to see the importance of yet another ACORN expose' by a dumpster diving, right wing hit job source. Some people think the election was stolen (although pesky facts prove that wrong- darnit; if you need sources, I have 'em). That's alright. I felt that way about Bush in 2001. Believe it or not, I feel your pain.
My "shadowy" experience: The Democratic Party got organized. I went to the Democratic Caucus. It was a dogfight between the Clinton and Obama camps. I chose Biden in the first Caucus. I went to the polls in both the Primary and General Election. I wasn't offered a brown shirt or given a copy of The Communist Manifesto. I didn't see any ACORNS - anywhere. What I did see were a bunch of pissed-off, hard working American voters who had enough of eight years under the Bush Cabal and wanted (God forbid!) a Change. "Change" - a dirty word in the Conservative lexicon.
Here's an idea for the Republicans - run a better ticket than a multiple cancer treatment, older than the hills Senator backed up by a Nazi in a Red Dress who just wants to "Go Rogue" on everything and everybody - at $28.99 a copy. Bless her heart. ...
Don't worry. I'm sure with all of yours' and Rush Limbaugh's help, Obama's presidency will be a smashing failure. Bravo and pass the tea bag. Meanwhile, on planet Earth the war rages on, 14K people lose their health insurance each day (US CENSUS BUREAU) and the economy further sinks...
Me: Wow...you know a post has a bit of "significance" when it sets off a firestorm like this article did.
1. My car is running beautiful, should I go out there and "change" it just because "change" is so cool?...
2. Obama promised "change" but it is really just the status quo...spend, tax, spend, tax, tax, spend. no different, the only "change" we've seen in the 1 year of Obama and the 4 years of a Democrat congress and Senate is the "change" in the unemployment of our workers...now pushing 11% up from 7% under Bushy.
The other change is the change in the national deficit
400 billion under Bush, now at 1.3 TRILLION under Obama - It will go much higher when the "collective" begins to dole out health care to the proletariat.
3. I love how libbies are so scared of Palin, I have never yet heard a single libbo tell me one thing that she has done wrong, besides accepting the position of running mate on a conservative platform. This is what I would call ad hoc and ad hominem arguments.
Palin: "I believe in TORT reform"
Scared Liberal response: "You're a NAZI! and you write BOOKS!"
not an intelligent argument in my opinion.
By the way, Hillary is out there pushing her tripe as well, but its been overshadowed because she doesn't have anything new to say.
Liberal Friend: 1) What? You didn't upgrade during Cash for Clunkers?!
2) However, the largest expansion of the federal gov't in history occurred under the Bush Administration. That tab is now coming due under Obama's presidency. How to pay? Tax and Spend worries you? How about Print and Spend? Thanks, GW!
3) Palin in 2012! Yes! ... Please! This is too easy. Quote The Roque: "As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border." Not an intelligent argument for foreign policy experience IMHO.
This concluded the discussion regarding ACORN and their corrupt practices.
As you can see it veered way off course and ended with Palin bashing.
I usually tend to give the last word if I got the first word, which in the case of posting this article, I did.
And, the final word was the same harmless rehash of liberal cut and pastes on Palin.
...a la Katie Couric’s ridiculous hack job that turned, what could have been, an informative Palin
interview into another left wing extremist propoganda spew. News reporter...what a joke.
I do address a few of the above points of my liberal friend in some upcoming debates: Which I will post here on Cloneyville.
Do comment if you love or hate - both are equally appreciated...
Here is the original article:
ACORN Scandal: Dumping Incriminating Documents
Here is the lively social blog discussion that ensued:
Liberal Friend’s Response: So a Breitbart Empire blog entry (probably found on Drudge in 72 pt. font size) is what passes for "news" these days? Socialists! Communists! ACORNS! Birth Certificates! Death Panels! Yawn. We've got soldiers dying in Afghanistan - get a grip.
My Response: Wow...must have struck a liberal nerve there.
I mean, considering that 12 ex-CNN staffers immediately abandoned CNN after the election to join Obamunist's staff, that pretty much brings the count to: NBC, CBS, and CNN in the tank for the libbies. Now we all HAVE to go to Breitbart, Mediawatch, Drudgereport, and just about anywhere else to get anything other than liberal propaganda. Its a sad state of affairs my friend BRING BACK JIMMY CARTER! We miss him.
Technically, Breitbart reported biggovernment.com's investigation obviously, because we would never hear anything about ACORN scandals on the above mentioned "news" outlets.
(I always put news in quotation marks because coming from ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, MSNBC
- it more resembles propaganda than it does actual journalistic reporting - which we call “news”.)
Conservative Friend #1: With Acorn suing the Goverment to get its (paid for by taxpayers) funding back, this needs to be said and it needs to be news.
Liberal Friend: Lot's of things need to be said and need to be news.
Here's one:
"4 US Service Members Die in Afghan Attacks
By HEIDI VOGT (AP)
KABUL — Bomb attacks and a firefight killed four U.S. troops in 24 hours in Afghanistan, the military said Monday, adding to the growing toll as NATO and the U.S. consider whether to send more forces to the war."
Keep collecting your ACORNS (and ex-CNN staffers), I'll watch the body count...
Conservative Friend: Personally, I grew up Military. I know the costs and the count. But, you are correct. Their sacrifice needs to be on the news and honored.
Now if our new administration will get off its duff and make a decision about Afganistan...
Conservative Friend #2: It's kinda funny how liberal's will defend this "news" because it casts an unkind shadow upon them..then try to make a smoke screen about another non related issue...it would sure play out differently if it was a conservative group that did the deeds that ACORN did...!
Liberal Friend: The funny liberal never once defended ACORN. I could care less about them or their waste management practices. I fail to see the importance of yet another ACORN expose' by a dumpster diving, right wing hit job source. Some people think the election was stolen (although pesky facts prove that wrong- darnit; if you need sources, I have 'em). That's alright. I felt that way about Bush in 2001. Believe it or not, I feel your pain.
My "shadowy" experience: The Democratic Party got organized. I went to the Democratic Caucus. It was a dogfight between the Clinton and Obama camps. I chose Biden in the first Caucus. I went to the polls in both the Primary and General Election. I wasn't offered a brown shirt or given a copy of The Communist Manifesto. I didn't see any ACORNS - anywhere. What I did see were a bunch of pissed-off, hard working American voters who had enough of eight years under the Bush Cabal and wanted (God forbid!) a Change. "Change" - a dirty word in the Conservative lexicon.
Here's an idea for the Republicans - run a better ticket than a multiple cancer treatment, older than the hills Senator backed up by a Nazi in a Red Dress who just wants to "Go Rogue" on everything and everybody - at $28.99 a copy. Bless her heart. ...
Don't worry. I'm sure with all of yours' and Rush Limbaugh's help, Obama's presidency will be a smashing failure. Bravo and pass the tea bag. Meanwhile, on planet Earth the war rages on, 14K people lose their health insurance each day (US CENSUS BUREAU) and the economy further sinks...
Me: Wow...you know a post has a bit of "significance" when it sets off a firestorm like this article did.
1. My car is running beautiful, should I go out there and "change" it just because "change" is so cool?...
2. Obama promised "change" but it is really just the status quo...spend, tax, spend, tax, tax, spend. no different, the only "change" we've seen in the 1 year of Obama and the 4 years of a Democrat congress and Senate is the "change" in the unemployment of our workers...now pushing 11% up from 7% under Bushy.
The other change is the change in the national deficit
400 billion under Bush, now at 1.3 TRILLION under Obama - It will go much higher when the "collective" begins to dole out health care to the proletariat.
3. I love how libbies are so scared of Palin, I have never yet heard a single libbo tell me one thing that she has done wrong, besides accepting the position of running mate on a conservative platform. This is what I would call ad hoc and ad hominem arguments.
Palin: "I believe in TORT reform"
Scared Liberal response: "You're a NAZI! and you write BOOKS!"
not an intelligent argument in my opinion.
By the way, Hillary is out there pushing her tripe as well, but its been overshadowed because she doesn't have anything new to say.
Liberal Friend: 1) What? You didn't upgrade during Cash for Clunkers?!
2) However, the largest expansion of the federal gov't in history occurred under the Bush Administration. That tab is now coming due under Obama's presidency. How to pay? Tax and Spend worries you? How about Print and Spend? Thanks, GW!
3) Palin in 2012! Yes! ... Please! This is too easy. Quote The Roque: "As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border." Not an intelligent argument for foreign policy experience IMHO.
This concluded the discussion regarding ACORN and their corrupt practices.
As you can see it veered way off course and ended with Palin bashing.
I usually tend to give the last word if I got the first word, which in the case of posting this article, I did.
And, the final word was the same harmless rehash of liberal cut and pastes on Palin.
...a la Katie Couric’s ridiculous hack job that turned, what could have been, an informative Palin
interview into another left wing extremist propoganda spew. News reporter...what a joke.
I do address a few of the above points of my liberal friend in some upcoming debates: Which I will post here on Cloneyville.
Do comment if you love or hate - both are equally appreciated...
0 Comments
Celiberal.com
05/01/10 22:55 Filed in: Hollytarded Liberal Celebs
I love these guys. A REAL look at the Hollytarded Libbo Celebs. This is a post from the Celiberal.com blog with my response at the bottom. The story that tmc6882 comments on, is from Breitbart.com - another untainted non-Koolaid outlet of information.
Let’s Not Offend Hollywood’s Delicate Geniuses
by tmc6882 on Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:13 pm
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccann ... ore-253134
by Cam Cannon
In 2006, while accepting the Academy Award for playing a husky, grizzled version of himself, George Clooney famously gushed, “…this Academy, this group of people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I’m proud to be a part of this Academy. I’m proud to be part of this community. I’m proud to be out of touch.”
My apologies for bringing up old crap, but Clooney’s statement, especially the part about how he’s so proud to be out of touch, is one of the most bafflingly odd things I’ve ever heard coming from Clooney, who’s also famous for telling anyone who’ll listen that everybody tells him all the time how brave he was for making a black and white movie about the red scare. It’s very revealing that Clooney would say this, to cheers, a mere three years after a child-rapist was handed an award by that same Academy.
Cut to the present, the child-rapist is caught, and much of Hollywood is outraged. “He should be allowed to live his life,” wrote Peter Bart, his words practically streaked with tears. Hey, guess what, Pete? He has been allowed to live his life. They’re all like Clooney, proud be out of touch. But why? To answer this question, we turn to the genius of one George Costanza.
They’re different than the rest of us. They’re “delicate geniuses.”
Back to the Academy Awards, who can forget Sean Penn humorlessly, smugly, embarrassingly chiding Chris Rock for poking fun at fellow delicate genius Jude Law? Rock’s offense? A joke, dripping with truth, which pointed out that Jude Law is not a box office draw. The box office doesn’t matter to them. Hell, look at the movies they nominate nowadays. They’ve grown more out of touch than ever. You think “The Sting” would get nominated for Best Picture today? Much less win? Or “Jaws”?
And then there’s David Cross (of “Arrested Development” fame), who brags that he snorted coke near Obama. If you don’t think that’s super-cool, then you’re probably a stupid Christian. He’s one of those atheists for whom it’s not nearly enough to just not believe in God, he has to build a stand-up career out of his atheism. He’s always been strangely uninformed about Christianity, but that doesn’t stop him from cracking hipster jokes about Christians. Back in 1999, he joked that he couldn’t wait to make fun of Christians when Y2K turned out to be a global non-factor. In this hilarious segment, Cross discussed Y2K more than my Southern Baptist Pastor did in an entire year.
Cross’ cocaine story, coupled with the story last week about Academy Award fixture Hilary Swank–the she sashays around the house nude in front of her boyfriend’s six-year-old kid–illustrates what’s gone wrong with the delicate geniuses. Hilary, please, put us on a need-to-know basis. You were way cooler when you were the underdog, the “Next Karate Kid” made good. We simply know too much about the delicate geniuses. The delicate geniuses would be more respected and adored by their audiences if they embraced a little mystery. Remember when Sean Penn crazily demanded privacy? He was sooooo much cooler then. We all knew Paul Newman was a liberal, but I never got the impression that he thought that made him smarter than his audience.
But that’s exactly how the current stars sound when they take credit for the Civil Rights Movement, or wish shame on the grandchildren of people with different opinions than their own (that’s you, Mr. Penn), or indulge us with their stories about getting a snootful of Bolivian Marching Powder while in the company of The Savior, or traipsing around nekkid in the company of kids. They’re enlightened, you see, and we’re the uneducated masses.
tmc6882
PhD from Celiberal
Re: Let’s Not Offend Hollywood’s Delicate Geniuses
by clonewolf on Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:24 pm
The funny thing about these Hollytards is that they think they are so "edgy and independent" in their thinking but in reality, they, like Cloonhole, have really drifted far from the reality that they are bourgeois, a part of the mainstream kool aid drinkers, and FAR from edgy OR independent in their thought. I just keep mental list of movies NOT to see based on the putrid performers in them. Just academy propoganda.
George Clonewolf Cloney
http://www.clonewolf.com
Let’s Not Offend Hollywood’s Delicate Geniuses
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccann ... ore-253134
by Cam Cannon
In 2006, while accepting the Academy Award for playing a husky, grizzled version of himself, George Clooney famously gushed, “…this Academy, this group of people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I’m proud to be a part of this Academy. I’m proud to be part of this community. I’m proud to be out of touch.”
My apologies for bringing up old crap, but Clooney’s statement, especially the part about how he’s so proud to be out of touch, is one of the most bafflingly odd things I’ve ever heard coming from Clooney, who’s also famous for telling anyone who’ll listen that everybody tells him all the time how brave he was for making a black and white movie about the red scare. It’s very revealing that Clooney would say this, to cheers, a mere three years after a child-rapist was handed an award by that same Academy.
Cut to the present, the child-rapist is caught, and much of Hollywood is outraged. “He should be allowed to live his life,” wrote Peter Bart, his words practically streaked with tears. Hey, guess what, Pete? He has been allowed to live his life. They’re all like Clooney, proud be out of touch. But why? To answer this question, we turn to the genius of one George Costanza.
They’re different than the rest of us. They’re “delicate geniuses.”
Back to the Academy Awards, who can forget Sean Penn humorlessly, smugly, embarrassingly chiding Chris Rock for poking fun at fellow delicate genius Jude Law? Rock’s offense? A joke, dripping with truth, which pointed out that Jude Law is not a box office draw. The box office doesn’t matter to them. Hell, look at the movies they nominate nowadays. They’ve grown more out of touch than ever. You think “The Sting” would get nominated for Best Picture today? Much less win? Or “Jaws”?
And then there’s David Cross (of “Arrested Development” fame), who brags that he snorted coke near Obama. If you don’t think that’s super-cool, then you’re probably a stupid Christian. He’s one of those atheists for whom it’s not nearly enough to just not believe in God, he has to build a stand-up career out of his atheism. He’s always been strangely uninformed about Christianity, but that doesn’t stop him from cracking hipster jokes about Christians. Back in 1999, he joked that he couldn’t wait to make fun of Christians when Y2K turned out to be a global non-factor. In this hilarious segment, Cross discussed Y2K more than my Southern Baptist Pastor did in an entire year.
Cross’ cocaine story, coupled with the story last week about Academy Award fixture Hilary Swank–the she sashays around the house nude in front of her boyfriend’s six-year-old kid–illustrates what’s gone wrong with the delicate geniuses. Hilary, please, put us on a need-to-know basis. You were way cooler when you were the underdog, the “Next Karate Kid” made good. We simply know too much about the delicate geniuses. The delicate geniuses would be more respected and adored by their audiences if they embraced a little mystery. Remember when Sean Penn crazily demanded privacy? He was sooooo much cooler then. We all knew Paul Newman was a liberal, but I never got the impression that he thought that made him smarter than his audience.
But that’s exactly how the current stars sound when they take credit for the Civil Rights Movement, or wish shame on the grandchildren of people with different opinions than their own (that’s you, Mr. Penn), or indulge us with their stories about getting a snootful of Bolivian Marching Powder while in the company of The Savior, or traipsing around nekkid in the company of kids. They’re enlightened, you see, and we’re the uneducated masses.
tmc6882
PhD from Celiberal
Re: Let’s Not Offend Hollywood’s Delicate Geniuses
The funny thing about these Hollytards is that they think they are so "edgy and independent" in their thinking but in reality, they, like Cloonhole, have really drifted far from the reality that they are bourgeois, a part of the mainstream kool aid drinkers, and FAR from edgy OR independent in their thought. I just keep mental list of movies NOT to see based on the putrid performers in them. Just academy propoganda.
George Clonewolf Cloney
http://www.clonewolf.com
The Clonewolf Chronicles
07/11/09 20:46
This is a blog dedicated to speaking boldly about political beliefs that run against the grain of Hollywood.
This is a blog dedicated to exposing the laughable ruse of CNN, NBC, CBS, and to an extent ABC for an obvious bias toward liberalism that EVERYONE can see except themselves!
This is a blog dedicated to demonstrating the foolishness of forcing atheism on the world even though atheism is the least thought-through of all faith-based belief systems. In fact, atheism requires MORE faith than theism. Darwin was a theology major that plagiarized “Origin of the Species” from his grandfather’s “Zooinomia”, this sounds like a shaky god to put your trust in, Matt “Dumb One” Damon.
This is a blog dedicated to exposing the laughable ruse of CNN, NBC, CBS, and to an extent ABC for an obvious bias toward liberalism that EVERYONE can see except themselves!
This is a blog dedicated to demonstrating the foolishness of forcing atheism on the world even though atheism is the least thought-through of all faith-based belief systems. In fact, atheism requires MORE faith than theism. Darwin was a theology major that plagiarized “Origin of the Species” from his grandfather’s “Zooinomia”, this sounds like a shaky god to put your trust in, Matt “Dumb One” Damon.